The Sinking Cargo of
Revit and BIM
Great things are achieved when you
have the tools. Revit and BIM, new technologies being implemented in the
engineering/construction/design world, push for greatness as designers,
architects, engineers, and parties related, bring their ideas from their minds
to reality through 3D interfaces. While these technologies are becoming more
adopted due to their benefits, many issues with the operation exist.
The user experience is one of the
main factors in determining the welfare of a program. In the case of Revit/BIM,
several users haven’t had the best experience due to glitches and bugs.
Revit/BIM applications are huge and require a large amount of a computer’s
processing. This leaves chances for computers to have problems if they do not
have a great graphics card. To use Revit/BIM, companies would have to buy
computers with appropriate processing abilities. Using computers that aren’t
suitable would make the program slow and “clog” up the machines. [1] With
machines that can’t really be used due to freezes, operation efficiency would
decrease. Additionally, Revit/BIM are not flexible and more susceptible to
user-generated problems. [2] As companies have their own way of operating, they
need custom designed elements for their BIM/Revit models. With the current
programs, users are forced to set up families in a certain way which can lead
to complication and could be cumbersome to designers.
Revit/BIM are not up to the point
where electric design is suitable. As of right now, Revit/BIM for the electoral
industry is lagging. [1] There is currently very low amount of electrical
design elements in the applications. Without the components to use for
electrical design, there’s no point for electrical designers to use the application
instead of other options.
This leads into the collaboration
issues between parties for using BIM/Revit. For the programs to be successful
for projects, everyone in the project should be on board. Currently the
industry is to blame as there are cultural separation of using the program.
Construction teams for example may not be well adept in using BIM/Revit as much
as architects. [2] Some sources have said that they encountered some awkward
and sometimes backward and unsystematic approaches with clients when presenting
BIM/Revit file structures. Clients may not have the program on their computers
as the technology is new.
Copyright infringement would also
be another issue with BIM/Revit. When using these programs, various design
elements are being fed into them. [2] However, the authors who create the
design elements to the application is not really acknowledge or creditability
is blurred. There is no way to know who created a design element first.
Another issue involves the case of
whether BIM/Revit is feasible to use in construction projects. For small scale
projects, sources say that it is not worth using since it’s an extra expense
where the return of investment wouldn’t be great. [2] Using BIM/Revit for small
projects wouldn’t be cost-effective. Instead of using BIM/Revit, the job can be
done much faster in CAD software. For large scale projects, people have said that
there is an awkwardness in deciding whether BIM/Revit should be used. It is a
great tool and can expedite the process, but for the issues discussed earlier,
the risks can be high.
References:
[1] Ireland, B. (2010, March 1). Growing Pains. Retrieved
January 31, 2017, from http://ecmweb.com/design/growing-pains
[2] Klimt, M. (2011, July 11). Legalese: The problem with
BIM. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/opinion/legalese-the-problem-with-bim/8617331.article
Maisson Ksara – Software like Revit are running really slow.
In my own personal experience, working with Revit has caused my computer to
crash unfortunately. I really hope the creators come up with better programming
to improve the program’s functionality. Additionally, I believe it will improve
with the evolution of technology. I can’t wait until BIM/Revit are used more
extensively, because as a user, I personally enjoy it.
Drew Hovey – Introducing new technology is always a
challenge for industries to face, especially in the case of BIM/Revit. When
certain methods are already set, people would have the concept of a successful
way in doing things. When exposed to something new that no one has done, there
are not statistical numbers to ensure a project’s success. It is a risk.
Ronald Herazo – I liked your evolution of BIM technology; specifically,
when you stated the problems for the owners, architects, and lawyers. So many
issues arise for many parties. Having them stated in a list is a great way to
acknowledge the issues. I haven’t thought about the problems for lawyers and
banks as much so that was an interesting take of future issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.