Showing posts with label CAD Softwares. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CAD Softwares. Show all posts

Monday, February 6, 2017

B4 - Term Project - Arthur McCloskey

In my term project, I will be working with Egla Qori to create a comprehensive set of structural families for use in Revit.  In particular, we will be focusing our effort on creating families of typical components of Reinforced Concrete Building Design, including beams, columns, caissons, slabs, drop panels, and varying types of each.
The reason we selected this project was so that we may use the families we create in our Senior Design Project.  Our Senior Design Project is the structural design of a 40-story hotel in Chicago, IL, for which we have the actual architectural plan set.  It was determined in fall term that we would pursue a reinforced concrete frame structural system.  While Revit has a preexisting collection of structural families, including almost all of the above components, we hope to include the possibility of reinforcement detailing within the families, as well as including any post-tensioning that may be required.  As of right now, it appears Revit only has the ability to specify reinforcement spacing and bar size. [1]  We hope to be able to include these in the model, and just export to a schedule.

The idea of “Intelligent Buildings” has a lot to do with Revit and streamlining the modeling process.  The most challenging part of reinforced concrete design is the placement and sizing of reinforcement and post-tensioning.  Revit has been attempting to make modeling more object oriented, but still has to rely on geometric and tabulation to handle certain components.  We believe that creating these families will make the modeling process easier for our Senior Design Project, and the structural plans will be easily generated from the whole model.

The biggest challenges we will face are in the creation of the families themselves.  After the first assignment, we have some experience in creating families, but that was a very simple example, with only geometric constraints.  We plan to be able to assign structural properties and detailing within the objects themselves, which poses a challenge when considering how many permutations of reinforcement spacing and post-tensioning stress.  Also, considering how large the building we are designing is, there are likely going to be many types per family, so it is a challenge just to design that many types and making sure they are all correctly created.
Comments on Others

Andy Dinh – Your project seems similar to mine, since you are also creating families in Revit and Bentley to compare the two software.  I think it will be interesting to see which program is easier for this, and I would be interested to see if there are any advantages to using Bentley for different system families (structures, HVAC, etc.).

Kerieanne Vogler – Your project seems really interesting because I feel like the life cycle analysis of buildings is not something that we like to think of as designers.  I’m actually taking a LCA class next term and would be interested in seeing how BIM could help make that easier, because from what I remember from other classes, LCA is really difficult.

Nick Pawlikowski – This project is really interesting because it seems to combine all the major themes we are studying in this class: databases, BIM, programming.  I think the idea for programmatically generating Revit families would be such a great functionality, and I’m excited to see if it works out!

References
[1]  Wikispaces.  “Introduction to Revit Structure Families.”  Web.  Available: http://bim.wikispaces.com/file/view/Introduction+to+Revit+Structure+Families.pdf


Tuesday, January 31, 2017

B3-How does Revit relate to Autocad and other drafting programs?-Mengnan Yang

The Revit is a very new software to me. Firstly, I want to write about my personal use feeling about the differences between the Revit, AutoCAD and the Sketch Up which are the three-popular draft software in the industry.
For my feeling, the Revit will be more intelligent than the AutoCAD and the Sketch Up. It will be very easy to make changes in the Revit. For example, when we make the format of the drawing sets, in the Revit, we only need to set a family file and make changes in the family file, and the changes will be applied to every drawing. But in the AutoCAD, we need to use blog or the X-drive to do the same thing. Sometimes, we need to enter by hand one by one to make changes. And when we want to insert a table to the drawing, the Revit needs have the table function, but the AutoCAD needs to enter manually.
Another difference for me is the rendering. The Revit has the inside rendering function. It will be easy to do the simple and quicker rendering in the Revit. But both Sketch Up and AutoCAD needs to download other software to do the rendering work.
But now for me, I will still use Sketch Up to do the outlook draft drawing and use CAD to make detailed plan and section drawing because I am more familiar with that two software.
Now, I read some materials about the differences between Revit and other software. And the last week class study. I feel like I have some official differences between Revit and Auto CAD.
AutoCAD is a great Software to create basic geometry that represents real life, mostly for 2D and drawing of partly details. But the Revit is great for modeling, clash detection, and change management. It is a software for the whole construction process not only for the drawings. AutoCAD Supports a drafting workflow, where individual drawings are created and edited independently. But the Revit support a group people work together at the same time. And the Revit is not only having detail drawings like plan or elevation but also combination with all model, schedule, and other elements in whole work flow.

Sources:

http://www.autodesk.com/solutions/revit-vs-autocad
Ronald: (Link)
I think you had a great post about the advantages of the Revit. Especially for the Sequence, which I didn’t think about that before. The Revit is great that can have different information in different levels, and come with a work path for different steps also make that information visually. There is too much information in the construction process, it is important that the Revit provides some sequences of the information
Andrew:(Link)
I like your analysis about the disadvantages of the Revit/BIM is very comprehensive. Especially about the electrical engineer. I didn’t pay attention about that. It is correct that the electrical engineers only can put the symbols in the drawings which is the same thing they did in the CAD drawing. I think now one of the biggest disadvantages for the BIM/Revit is that the people are not familiar with it and still need a process to learn and get into it.
Arthur: (Link)

I like your analysis that the future program will include capabilities like structural calculations, HVAC flow calculations, electrical component sizing. Which will be very helpful for engineers to work with Revit. And one of my hope about Revit is that paperless. Which the Revit can be used on PC, Pad, Phone and all the equipment to save the paper and paper work time.  

Monday, January 30, 2017

B3 - Group C - Andy Dinh - Possible future advantages of Revit/BIM

As we have seen through the few weeks so far from in class discussion and through research of our own, we can gather many advantages that Revit and other BIM software can already offer. compared to the days of hand drawings, Revit and other software offer much more accessibility to designing buildings and other structures without the need of such practice. This helps streamline projects more and allow for better turnarounds on design. Such simple tasks like drawing a straight line is made a lot easy without the need for needing a tool to keep your pencil straight. In the early days there are certainly kinks that needed to be worked out, but seeing how the technology has developed thus far gives high hopes to what the future can hold.

Time, as noted before, is a key factor in the turnaround of projects. There are always deadlines to meet, and the development of BIM is certainly helping reach those deadlines at a much better rate. Coordination and collaboration is a part of this as well. I believe that through better accessibility, even for owners and facility mangers, information on the design of the building can get to those who need it in a much more proficient way with greater ease. Not only is collaboration between those involved is important, but coordination between the user and the program or software is as important. Revit can already detect clashes within the design itself between objects. With adapting AI that has started to get better over the years, these clashes could possibly be fixed without needed human interaction, or at least what the recommended solutions are given for a problem that the user might run in to. Such solutions are already being worked on like ClashMEP [1].

Another future advantage we can look into is cost analysis. This topic can cover a wide variety of items, such as lighting, materials, energy use, and other items that play into how much a structure costs. Being able to gather and display how much everything will cost will help eliminate costly components for more sustainable alternatives. Also, having developing technology in covering maintenance requirements, and with the possible development of AI building maintenance, this technology can help mitigate both short term and long term costs. Different solutions can help solve different problems, so being able to collect all these solutions together and compare them in a much more efficient manner can help push things along.

References:
[1] Calvert, Neil. "10 Points and the Benefits of BIM." VDC and BIM Construction Blog. Synchro Software, 12 Dec. 2013. Web. 30 Jan. 2017. <http://blog.synchroltd.com/10-points-and-the-benefits-of-bim>.
[2] Digital School Technical Design College. "Advantages of Revit's Building Information Modeling." Digital School. Autodesk, 17 Oct. 2016. Web. 30 Jan. 2017. <http://digitalschool.ca/advantages-of-revits-building-information-modeling/>.
[3] Zeiger, Mimi. "The Future of BIM." Architect. N.p., 11 Nov. 2008. Web. 30 Jan. 2017. <http://www.architectmagazine.com/technology/the-future-of-bim_o>.

Comments:

Arthur McCloskey (link): It was interesting being able to read your post and comparing what the other side thinks about Revit in the future. Your drawbacks that you posted certainly do have ground to it and make sense. We can already see how over reliant we are as a society on technology, even with technology outside of BIM like our evolving smartphones and social media and such. Hopefully, we can learn on how technology can help us innovate more rather than be hindered by it, but we will have to see what the future holds in store for us. Also, with ever evolving technology in most fields, I hope we have computers that can handle such demanding tasks from the software we use, but that depends on whether the computer or software has a leg up in development.

Zhijing Zheng (link): Seeing what current issues we have with BIM software was an insight into how it is perceived today. Many can say how much it has helped in a project, but some do not really give much on how it hinders certain aspects. The point that stood out to me from your post was about the cash flow involving the program. Seeing how fees are being lowered through the ease of what the program can provide is a little depressing. Hopefully there is a better demand for it later on that will increase interest, effectively increasing competitiveness and more proportional costs for the work demanded for.

Ray Powell (link): Reading your post about what current advantages we already have for BIM gives me more credence into what I hope to see for the future of BIM. BIM is advancing as much as it can, and being able to see how it has changed from my first involvement with it back in high school about 5 or 6 years ago, there is hope that BIM can stay on that track of rapid development or it may even evolve faster than the current rate it is going right now. It would be good to see the current advantages stay true in the future.

B3: Revit vs. Other Softwares - Sanchez - Group E

Revit vs. other CAD software
To begin this post, I have to admit that I have never used Revit before and have no knowledge of the software. As a business and engineering major, I have taken MEM 201 - Introduction to Computer Aided Design, which we used AutoCAD and Creo Parameter. I addition, I did take CAEE 202 - Introduction to Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, use to be CAEE 201, but they removed the Revit lab from the curriculum so I did not have the opportunity to use this software before this class. In our previous class, we had a brief discussion on how Revit relates to other drafting software. I decided to look at the differences between Revit vs. AutoCAD and Revit vs. AutoCAD.


Revit vs. AutoCAD
A quick comparison of Revit vs. SolidWorks will give you many similarities and differences:
  • User base - Revit is mainly used by structural developers and designers while AutoCAD is used mainly by any 2D/3D designer or drafter.
  • Scope & Discipline - Revit is mainly used by people in architecture and construction while AutoCAD is used for general designing and drafting (civil, mechanical, and architecture).
  • Main use - Revit is mainly used for 2D sketching and 3D design and rendering while AutoCAD is mainly used for 2D design and documentation.
  • Learning Curve - Revit is rated as average while AutoCAD is rated as low


Revit vs. SolidWorks
A quick comparison of Revit vs. SolidWorks will give you many similarities and differences:
  • User base - Revit is used by architects, engineers, and designers but SolidWorks is used by engineers and designers.
  • Collaboration Features - In Revit users are able to 2D to 3D CAD conversion, 3D printing but in SolidWorks users are unable to use this feature.
  • In Revit users are unable to perform advanced surfacing features that users are allowed to use in SolidWorks.
  • A similarity in the two software's is that users can do 2D and 3D drawings, parametric modeling, and photorealistic renderings are available in both.


Sources:
http://cad.softwareinsider.com/compare/24-130/SolidWorks-vs-Revit