Delayed submittal due to being hospitalized and hand injury.
Chapter 3 –
Interoperability
Interoperability depicts the need
to pass data between applications, allowing multiple types of experts and
applications to contribute to the work at hand. The data is passed between
applications by the standardization of file formats. Same or similar file
formats allow for programs to be compatible with each other. The data models
developed would support product and object model exchanges within different
industries by the ISO – STEP international standards effort. [1] Geometry,
relations, processes and material, performance, fabrication, and other
properties used for design and production can be transferred more fluidly from
one application to another. With more fluidity between programs, efficiency in
a project increases.
One example of a formalized file
format or language is EXPRESS. EXPRESS enables applications that have multiple
redundant types of attributes and geometry to export and import different
information from each other to describe the same object [1]. Design and
construction benefits from this as the design process requires people to work
together. Each certain step passes on information from one phase to the next.
For example, when a design of a building is drafted, it must be passed onto
someone else such as the contractor who then works on shop drawings. The
contractor may or may not use the same program to do so. Other examples include
the analysis of some system in a building. Structural and energy analysis, cost
estimation, scheduling, and other aspects are worked on in a project and are
typically done by different parties involved. The data passed between the parties
must somehow be accessible as the parties have different methods to accomplish
their work. The huge benefit of interoperability is that it eliminates the need
to replicate data that has already been generated. By using data already made
and instead of remaking it, work flow is made more smoothly. Architecture and
construction go hand in hand, and saving time in this industry can save a lot
of money.
By bringing numerous companies
together, Robert Fulton, a NASA representative, facilitated the creation of a
public domain exchange format for CAD software. He demanded that information
can be shared between applications. I found this action to be extremely
forceful but needed. Fulton being in NASA has the position to make such demands
made me chuckle a bit. His action, however, created data exchanges in four main
ways. [1]
1.
Direct, proprietary links between BIM tools
2.
Proprietary file exchange formats, primarily
dealing with geometry
3.
Public product data model exchange formations
4.
XML – based exchange formats
These four methods were how the companies exchanged data for
their CAD software.
The AEC also made data exchanges more compatible. Common
file formats are shown in the table below.

These formats designed to show some form of shape or
geometry became compatible starting around the mid-1980s [1]. After many data
exchanges of complex models between Europe and the US, the International
Standards Organization (ISO) in Geneva, Switzerland, initiated TC184, a
technical committee to develop STEP, Standard for the Exchange of Product Model
Data. This increased communication of what the parties involved want to
accomplish in some project. The Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) also was
developed to make consistent data representation of building information for
exchanges between AEC software [1]. The library of objects and property
definitions enabled the data to be generated properly when retrieved from one
application and placed on another. A main benefit the IFC provided is building
information analyzation. It covers the whole building lifecycle. In the design
phase, structural and mechanical elements are simulated with the different extensions.
The IFC addresses any limitations between the file extensions and with its next
releases covers the issue. They respond to the users and get their input for the
developers to come up with solutions. With BIM tools, IFC translators revert
the shapes made into data to be exported and rebuilt in another interface. The
data can be exchanged between programs such as Revit and Bentley Structures.
This makes life easier for a structural engineer as he is given different
options to approach his design or analysis.
Source:
[1] Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R. and Liston, K.
(2008) Interoperability, in BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information
Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470261309.ch3
Comments:
Taryn Francischetti – Reading your explanation of the
concept of families on BIM software was very interesting. As users can draw shapes
and lines, the shapes are predefined. I find this very efficient as there won’t
be time used to go back and declare what lines are which feature. This would save
time in the construction industry.
Paulina Gawor - When
you mention about poor interoperability costs, I started to think about all the
dreadful expenses that can add up. Poor communication and applications that do
not work together or can’t share information can lead to unnecessary wasted
time. It also would most likely increase stress in the work place and many
other negative effects would occur as a result.
Mengnan Yang – BIM models is great tool for contractors. Collaboration
between the parties and between the steps you’ve mentioned increases the
efficiency of workflow. With BIM estimation of costs and visualization to
explain the design, a lot of benefits for the parties involved are created.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.