When I registered for this course, I was unsure of what I was getting into. The course name Intelligent Buildings gave me the first impression that the course would be centered around case studies of buildings that have utilized advanced technologies to meet the needs of the owners, designers, and occupants. I also assumed that we would be learning about these technologies and how to implement them. While the course did fall short of my initial expectations, there is no denying that I have gained a significant amount of knowledge through it.
Part of my qualms with this course come from the nature of the course itself. I understand the difficulties of building curriculum for teaching about the future of the AEC industry. Any prediction or discussion of the future has to be taken with a heap of salt; the technologies that we are focusing on now (drones, 3D printing) may not end up being the innovation that shakes up the industry, and likewise a currently unknown technology may come out of nowhere and pivot the industry in a new, unpredictable direction. I recognize the value of discussing the technologies that are currently at the forefront of innovation, even if the discussion is at a cursory level. However, much of the discussion in this course covered topics that I already knew about, in a depth at which I was already quite familiar. Many of the lectures in this course, especially those on 3D printing and BIM, seemed to provide the educational equivalent of reading a handful of tech articles. The most I can say about the value I received from these lectures is simply an awareness of the technologies with no idea of how they are actually implemented in practice.
The greatest value I gained from this course is in the area of Databases. I had not used MS Access or any type of database before, and now that this course has concluded I am capable of creating a working relational database from scratch. I consider this a great value because I learned how to actually use database software, rather than simply knowing the theory of SQL and relational databases. Moreover, the gap between knowing the theory of databases and knowing how to use databases is a significant chasm. This leads me to assume that the gaps between the cursory knowledge we gained on other technologies and their implementation are similarly large. No amount of self-directed learning would be sufficient to close the gaps in all these areas. Although I recognize now that this course was meant to serve as an introduction to emerging technologies, I maintain that the value I gleaned from it was less than expected, and concentrated in only a few areas.
Finally, reading the posts of others makes me consider that the value of this course is relative to one's level of knowledge before the course, their expectations for the course, their academic position, and their professional interests. While the course provided lower-than-expected value for me, I now recognize that it could provide exceptional value to others who's positions are different than my own.
COMMENTS:
On Aziz AlSaleem's Post:
Aziz, Your post provides some useful perspective for me after writing my post. For me, this course provided less knowledge than I expected, but for you it provided more than you expected. This makes me consider that the value of this course can be great for some and less for others, depending on the knowledge that one had before the class began. I also recognize that I may be privileged to have learned about many of the topics discussed before, and that may be why I perceived the value of the class to be lower than my expectations.
On Brandon Mengel's Post:
Brandon, my favorite part of this course was also the personal project. I agree with you that the freedom given to pursue the project was beneficial, and for me it allowed me to take a deep dive into one particular subject and gain a significant amount of useful knowledge. I also agree that BIM will most likely be the main driver of change in the AEC industry. I also think that 3D printing will be used more in the industry, but I am skeptical that it will be as game-changing as some predict. I am of the opinion that the majority of 3D printing will be reserved for constructing smaller, non-structural elements.
On Rachel Frank's Post:
Rachel, reading your post makes me consider how valuable this course can be to students who haven't chosen a concentration yet. As a student in the structural concentration, I was looking for specifics about how the technologies discussed in the course are actually implemented in practice, alongside current methods of design. However, your comment about how this is essentially the only course related to the digital building concentration that can be taken before one decided on their concentration makes me realize that this course could provide incredible value to those interested in pursuing the digital building concentration.